Cities involved in the field trial
The six cities involved in the XLAW field trial, with surface area, population, density, territorial organization and PCrime index.
Field trial · results · impact
This page collects the key explanatory images: cities involved, objectives, analysis method, predictive accuracy, results by city, effectiveness, no displacement, operator participation and media impact.
The images do not replace the Zenodo publication, but they help readers quickly understand the main results and methodological path of the XLAW experience.
The six cities involved in the XLAW field trial, with surface area, population, density, territorial organization and PCrime index.
Summary of documented objectives: operational effectiveness, human capital, cost savings and broader implications.
The distinction between quantitative and qualitative analysis used to assess results, accuracy, participation, impact and perception.
The prediction accuracy framework reported for Naples, Salerno, Prato, Venice, Parma and Modena.
Prevention and economic results for each trial city, including reductions by crime type and savings indicators.
Comparison between trial cities and similar non-trial cities in terms of crime reduction and number of crimes avoided.
Representation of the operational difference between traditional prevention and prevention supported by the XLAW method.
Displacement verification: the phenomenon decreases without moving toward the alternative observed points.
Evidence of increased proactive controls by operators stimulated by predictive outputs.
Press, web and TV figures associated with the public dissemination of the XLAW experience.